The Philosophy, Science & Religion forum has been created as an unmoderated forum. The issues discussed here can and will get very intense. Please show respect and appreciation to alternative views posted here. We appreciate your consideration.
Did someone remove the whole discussion of Celtic Christianity? If so, why? the record of posts in peoples' "find all posts for this member" file does not show all that discussion either.
Hold on now. I was asking what happened to the thread because I wanted to add something and I couldn't find it suddenly -- not accusing anyone of deliberately deleting it for political reasons. I'm sure there's a good explanation, and someone will let us know.
Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 4,792
Joined: 20-Jun-2003 Zodiac: Holly
Realm: The frontier of Penn's Woods
It appears that the originator of this topic deleted it and not the moderating staff... that is what seems evident at this time.
If it is a different story I will let you know..
Be carefull of the stones you throw!
There were several other topics this person posted that are gone as well!
--------------------
I support the separation of church and hate!
IMAGINATION - the freest and largest nation in the world!
One can not profess to be of "GOD" and show intolerence and prejudice towards the beliefs of others.
Am fear nach gleidh na h–airm san t–sith, cha bhi iad aige ’n am a’ chogaidh. He that keeps not his arms in time of peace will have none in time of war.
"We're all in this together , in the parking lot between faith and fear" ... O.C.M.S.
“Beasts feed; man eats; only the man of intellect knows how to eat well.”
"Without food we are nothing, without history we are lost." - SHADOWS
Is iomadh duine laghach a mhill an Creideamh. Religion has spoiled many a good man.
The originator of the topic did delete the topic. Macfive has now removed this option from the Founders' options. Instead, a Founding member can only delete their own posts, not the entire topic. There was no conspiracy and especially no heavy-handed censorship from the moderating staff here at CR.
Things like this do happen as the site grows and grows. It's a learning curve all around and it is feed-back from the membership that allows continual improvement to the site and the services it provides.
Dear Lord, lest I continue in my complacent ways, help me to remember that someone died for me today. And if there be war, help me to remember to ask and to answer "am I worth dying for?" - Eleanor Roosevelt
The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools. -- Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)
Thanks, Steve. I appreciate knowing what became of the discussion. In a very general way, I would like to comment that, while I can see why the originator of a thread might be unhappy or uncomfortable with the way the discussion progresses, and want to close it out or delete it, still -- once other members have contributed their thoughts (and some of the members here seem to take some time and effort to post very useful and thought provoking entries), the thread has become the shared "intellectul property" of the community, and, unless the discussion has violated the site's posting rules in some overt way, the deletion of an entire thread at the originator's request should only be undertaken after some warning, so that other members who contributed have the opportunity to salvage at least their own entries, if they like, and reframe the discussion by opening it under a new title.
Thanks, Steve. I appreciate knowing what became of the discussion. In a very general way, I would like to comment that, while I can see why the originator of a thread might be unhappy or uncomfortable with the way the discussion progresses, and want to close it out or delete it, still -- once other members have contributed their thoughts (and some of the members here seem to take some time and effort to post very useful and thought provoking entries), the thread has become the shared "intellectul property" of the community, and, unless the discussion has violated the site's posting rules in some overt way, the deletion of an entire thread at the originator's request should only be undertaken after some warning, so that other members who contributed have the opportunity to salvage at least their own entries, if they like, and reframe the discussion by opening it under a new title.
It was the intellectual property aspect that came to the forefront and was used as one point of NOT allowing a topic to be deleted. Especially after several posts were made to the topic. The topic and the direction that it takes becomes public property and the deletion effects more than just the originator. There have been many topics that took on a life of their own, i.e. the "test" topic in the Jester's Court forum. The response was one of protecting public property and allowing free speech to take place without the threat of any reprisals.
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)