Printable Version of Topic
Click here to view this topic in its original format
Celtic Radio Community > Politics & Current Events > Obama Suspends First Amendment!


Posted by: Patch 03-Jul-2010, 05:35 PM
http://www.naturalnews.com/029130_Gulf_of_Mexico_censorship.html

First Amendment suspended in the Gulf of Mexico as spill cover-up goes
Orwellian
Saturday, July 03, 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

(NaturalNews) As CNN is now reporting, the U.S. government has issued a new
rule that would make it a felony crime for any journalist, reporter, blogger
or photographer to approach any oil cleanup operation, equipment or vessel
in the Gulf of Mexico. Anyone caught is subject to arrest, a $40,000 fine
and prosecution for a federal felony crime.

CNN reporter Anderson Cooper says, "A new law passed today, and back by the
force of law and the threat of fines and felony charges, ... will prevent
reporters and photographers from getting anywhere close to booms and
oil-soaked wildlife just about any place we need to be. By now you're
probably familiar with cleanup crews stiff-arming the media, private
security blocking cameras, ordinary workers clamming up, some not even
saying who they're working for because they're afraid of losing their jobs."

Watch the video clip yourself at NaturalNews.TV:
http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=203

The rule, of course, is designed to restrict the media's access to cleanup
operations in order to keep images of oil-covered seabirds off the nation's
televisions. With this, the Gulf Coast cleanup operation has now entered a
weird Orwellian reality where the news is shaped, censored and controlled by
the government in order to prevent the public from learning the truth about
what's really happening in the Gulf.

The war is on to control your mind

If all this sounds familiar, it's because the U.S. government uses this same
tactic during every war. The first casualty of war, as they say, is the
truth. There are lots of war images the government doesn't want you to see
(like military helicopter pilots shooting up Reuters photographers while
screaming "Yee-Haw!" over the comm radios), and there are other images they
do want you to see ("surgical strike" explosions from "smart" bombs, which
makes it seem like the military is doing something useful). So war reporting
is carefully monopolized by the government to deliver precisely the images
they want you to see while censoring everything else.

Now the same Big Brother approach is being used in the Gulf of Mexico:
Criminalize journalists, censor the story and try to keep the American
people ignorant of what's really happening. It's just the latest tactic from
a government that no longer even recognizes the U.S. Constitution or its
Bill of Rights. Because the very first right is Freedom of Speech, which
absolutely includes the right to walk onto a public beach and take
photographs of something happening out in the open, on public waters. It is
one of the most basic rights of our citizens and our press.

But now the Obama administration has stripped away those rights,
transforming journalists into criminals. Now, we might expect something like
this from Chavez, or Castro or even the communist leaders of China, but here
in the United States, we've all been promised we lived in "the land of the
free." Obama apparently does not subscribe to that philosophy anymore (if he
ever did).

So how does criminalizing journalists equate to "land of the free?" It
doesn't, obviously. Forget freedom. (Your government already has.) This is
about controlling your mind to make sure you don't visually see the truth of
what the oil industry has done to your oceans, your shorelines and your
beaches. This is all about keeping you ignorant with a total media blackout
of the real story of what's happening in the Gulf.

The real story, you see, is just too ugly. And the government has fracked up
the cleanup effort to such a ridiculous extent that instead of the
"transparency" they once promised, they're now resorting to the threat of
arrest for all journalists who try to get close enough to cover the story.

Yes, this is happening right now in America. This isn't a hoax. I know, it
sounds more like something you might hear about in Saudi Arabia, or
Venezuela or some other nation run by dictators. But now it's happening
right here in the USA.

As Anderson Cooper reported on CNN:

"Now the government is getting in on the act. Despite what Admiral Thad
Allen promised about transparency just nearly a month ago.

Thad Allen: "The media will have uninhibited access anywhere we're doing
operations..."

Anderson Cooper: The Coast Guard today announced new rules keeping
photographers, reporters and anyone else from coming with 65 feet of any
response vessel or booms out on the water or on beaches. What this means is
that oil-soaked birds on an island surrounded by a boom, you can't get close
enough to take that picture. Shot of oil on beaches with booms? Stay 65 feet
away. Pictures of oil-soaked booms uselessly laying in the water because
they haven't been collected like they should? You can't get close enough to
see that. Believe me, that is out there. But you only know that if you get
close to it, and now you can't without permission. Violators could face a
fine of $40,000 and Class D felony charges."

See the video yourself at: http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=203

Welcome to the (censored) club

All I can say to CNN is: Welcome to the club! This kind of censorship,
intimidation and tyranny has been going on for decades in the field of
health, where the Orwellian FDA has treated the entire U.S. public to a
nationwide blackout on truthful health information about healing foods and
nutritional supplements. CNN has never covered that story, by the way. Most
of the mainstream media has, in fact, gone right along with censorship of
truthful health information by the FDA and FTC.

Now they're suddenly crying wolf. But where was the media when the FDA was
raiding nutritional supplement companies and arresting people who dared to
sell healing foods with honest descriptions about how they might help
protect your health? The media went right along with the cover-up and never
bothered to even tell its viewers a cover-up was taking place.

You see, even CNN is willing to tolerate some Orwellian censorship, as long
as its advertisers are okay with it. The only reason they're talking about
censorship in the Gulf of Mexico right now is because oil companies don't
influence enough of their advertising budget to yank the story.


Censorship is not okay in a free society

I like the fact that CNN is finding the courage to speak up now about this
censorship in the Gulf, but I wish they wouldn't stay silent on the other
media blackouts in which they have long participated. Media censorship is
bad for any nation, and it should be challenged regardless of the topic at
hand. When the media is not allowed to report the truth on a subject -- any
subject! -- the nation suffers some loss as a result.

Without the light of media scrutiny, corporations and government will get
away with unimaginable crimes against both humanity and nature. That's
what's happening right now in the Gulf of Mexico: A crime against nature.

Obama doesn't want you to see that crime. He's covering it up to the benefit
of BP. He's keeping you in the dark by threatening reporters and
photographers with arrest. How's that for "total transparency?"

The only thing transparent here is that President Barack Obama has violated
his own oath of office by refusing to defend the Constitution. By any honest
measure, in fact, these actions, which are endorsed by the White House,
stand in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution. And that means this new
censorship rule in the Gulf, which suspends the First Amendment, is
unconstitutional. It also means those who decided on this rule are enemies
of freedom.

They are the ones who should be arrested and hauled off to federal prison,
not the CNN reporters who are trying to cover this story.


The seeds of tyranny

The loss of life in the Gulf of Mexico isn't the only catastrophe taking
place here, you see: Now we're losing our freedoms while our government
tries to intentionally blind us all from the truth of what's happening on
our own public beaches.

When those who seek truth are branded criminals by the government, it is
only a matter of time before that government expands its criminalization
labeling to include anyone who disagrees with it. These are the seeds of
tyranny, and Obama is planting them at your doorstep right now.

What BP did to the Gulf Coast, Obama is now doing to your freedom.

Posted by: Patch 03-Jul-2010, 07:05 PM
This is the mark of an administration that has totally lost control!!

Slàinte,    

Patch    

Posted by: wdorholt 03-Jul-2010, 11:45 PM
I haven't seen anything in the major news, including CNN, on this has anyone else? Maybe there will be something on the Sunday talk shows.

Certainly would raise some issues and should be explained as to why the safety concerns require this 65 foot rule.

Posted by: Patch 04-Jul-2010, 12:22 AM
This was forwarded to me by a lady who was an outspoken obama supporter during the election but has since changed her mind as have many.

Watch the link to the video included with the post. It covers it well and you will recognize the newscaster.

Like it or not it was done.

This action has our answering machines full and calls still coming in.

He is doing more to help the Tea Party movement than we could ever do. I can not wait till November.

Slàinte,    

Patch    

Posted by: Jillian 04-Jul-2010, 07:02 AM
Anderson Cooper appeared pretty peaved about it!

My heart is breaking for our wildlife. A Vietnam veteran I work with and his wife went to Louisiana to help and got turned away. Apparently there is some rule about non-scientists (or non-specialists) touching the sea turtles. They were very disappointed because they are avid sea turtle people.

Jillian

Posted by: Patch 04-Jul-2010, 11:23 AM
The gulf states will accept any help they can get. If there are rules they are federal and it is like the sand berms, the La. marshes were trashed because the govt was worried about moving sand. The feds felt it was better to subject the sensitive marshes to a long term destructive agent than to temporarily move sand. The govt REaction (not action but reaction) was poorly thought out or just plain ignorant. Unfortunately the same continues to be true.

Now they are moving to get their own screaming supporters off their back. I suspect and hope the media will continue to run their old footage to keep everyones feet to the fire.

Slàinte,    Patch    

Posted by: Mailagnas maqqas Dunaidonas 05-Jul-2010, 07:33 AM
I'm beginning to wonder some of my right-wing friends may be right--they think Mr. Obama is using every crisis to further centralize power and bankrupt the nation to allow a complete Marxist takeover. It's harder and harder to believe that his "mistakes" are the mark of someone truly lacking the experience needed for the job. Rather, I'm beginning to wonder whether he truly is hiding a Marxist agenda behind what otherwise appear to be foolish mistakes.
Destruction of the 1st Amendment would certainly be in accord with a Marxist agenda.

Posted by: Patch 05-Jul-2010, 11:53 AM
I applaud your astute observations.

All who see what you have observed hope that we are wrong as the ramifications of it would be horrendous.

What really concerns me is the emerging thinking that some of the crises may be contrived.

Slàinte,    

Patch    

Powered by Invision Power Board (https://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (https://www.invisionpower.com)