QUOTE (Jillian @ 05-Sep-2010, 09:21 PM) | QUOTE | read last week that the unions had pledged 80 M for the Nov. election. Industry has set aside a reputed 100 M. Add the private interest groups, the individuals and we may be around 8 or 9 hundred million for an off term election. That in the midst of a recession! There is something seriously flawed with that picture! --Patch
|
When govt becomes too powerful, big money on both sides feel they have to up the ante to stay in the race w/each other. Meanwhile, back on the farm, those millions could put many back to work.
Jillian
|
The recent SCOTUS decision allowing corporations to purchase political ads ups the ante and candidates have to raise enough funds to defend themselves and/or spread what message they have. It has nothing to do with government power but with economic realities. The only way to have your views or your sales pitch in front of your constituency is via television which is expensive. I'm not saying there isn't waste, I'm certain there is, but candidates don't have a prayer without raising big bucks. I knew a state senator once who had to spend in excess of $2 million just to run for the state senate, and that was about 20 years ago.
--------------------
Yr hen Gymraeg i mi, Hon ydyw iaith teimladau, Ac adlais i guriadau Fy nghalon ydyw hi --- Mynyddog
|